[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0607211623270.28469@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:23:49 +0200 (MEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Vadim Lobanov <vlobanov@...akeasy.net>,
Shorty Porty <getshorty_@...mail.com>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 2)
>The changes are:
>* u2 has been corrected to u1 (and also added it as __u1)
Do we really need this? Is not 'bool' enough?
Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists