linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers: Conversions from kmalloc+memset to k(z|c)alloc.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:20:48 +0200
From:	"Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
To:	"Stefan Richter" <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc:	"Jeff Garzik" <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	"Rolf Eike Beer" <eike-kernel@...tec.de>,
	"Panagiotis Issaris" <takis@...umba.uhasselt.be>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, len.brown@...el.com,
	chas@....nrl.navy.mil, miquel@...uba.ar, kkeil@...e.de,
	benh@...nel.crashing.org, video4linux-list@...hat.com,
	rmk+mmc@....linux.org.uk, Neela.Kolli@...enio.com,
	vandrove@...cvut.cz, adaplas@....net, thomas@...ischhofer.net,
	weissg@...nna.at, philb@....org, linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org,
	jkmaline@...hut.fi, paulus@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: Conversions from kmalloc+memset to k(z|c)alloc.

On 21/07/06, Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Pekka Enberg wrote:
> >> On 7/21/06, Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de> wrote:
> >>> > -     if (!(handle = kmalloc(sizeof(struct input_handle), GFP_KERNEL)))
> >>> > +     handle = kzalloc(sizeof(struct input_handle), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>> > +     if (!handle)
> >>> >               return NULL;
> >>>
> >>> sizeof(*handle)?
> >>
> >> In general, yes. However, some maintainers don't like that, so I would
> >> recommend to keep them as-is unless you get a clear ack from the
> >> maintainer to change it.
>
> I suggest:
>  - check if "sizeof(type)"->"sizeof(*ptr)" is correct
>  - if yes, change it
[snip]
>  - better style of the size argument where correct,

Who says it's "better style" ?
You can argue that   sizeof(type) is more readable.
When reading the code you don't have to go lookup the type of ptr in
sizeof(*ptr)  before you know what type the code is working with.

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/