| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20060721205056.18b428eb.kernel1@cyberdogtech.com> Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:50:56 -0400 From: Matt LaPlante <kernel1@...erdogtech.com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: How long to wait on patches? I checked the FAQ but didn't see an answer to this. Over the past few weeks I've submitted probably around 8 simple typo-fix patches all of which seemed to be approved by others on the list. I've been following the GIT, but these patches haven't been merged yet. I know people are busy with other things, probably more important, but I would like to know how long is "acceptable" to wait before I should re-submit a patch. Obviously if enough time passes, patches start to break as source files change. I don't mean to be a nuisance; I'm just trying to determine proper protocol. That and the fact I can submit several more patches once I get some of these old ones out of my queue. :) -- Matt LaPlante kernel1@...erdogtech.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists