[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0607211541560.5705@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Lang <dlang@...italinsight.com>
To: Matt LaPlante <kernel1@...erdogtech.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How long to wait on patches?
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Matt LaPlante wrote:
> I checked the FAQ but didn't see an answer to this. Over the past few weeks
> I've submitted probably around 8 simple typo-fix patches all of which seemed
> to be approved by others on the list. I've been following the GIT, but these
> patches haven't been merged yet. I know people are busy with other things,
> probably more important, but I would like to know how long is "acceptable" to
> wait before I should re-submit a patch. Obviously if enough time passes,
> patches start to break as source files change. I don't mean to be a nuisance;
> I'm just trying to determine proper protocol. That and the fact I can submit
> several more patches once I get some of these old ones out of my queue. :)
be sure to watch the -mm tree as well, a lot of patches are picked up by Andrew
to be fed to Linus that way
this is a particularly bad week since almost all the core developers were up at
OLS.
one thing you may want to look at doing (hosting permitting) is to setup a git
tree to just hold your trivial patches so that they can be pulled easily.
I thought there was a person who was maintaining a -trivial tree for this
purpose, I don't remember who it was though.
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists