[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44C28472.2080509@pobox.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 16:02:58 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
To: Tomasz Kłoczko <kloczek@...y.mif.pg.gda.pl>
CC: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...Helsinki.FI>,
Panagiotis Issaris <takis@....org>,
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de>,
Panagiotis Issaris <takis@...umba.uhasselt.be>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, len.brown@...el.com,
chas@....nrl.navy.mil, miquel@...uba.ar, kkeil@...e.de,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, video4linux-list@...hat.com,
rmk+mmc@....linux.org.uk, Neela.Kolli@...enio.com,
vandrove@...cvut.cz, adaplas@....net, thomas@...ischhofer.net,
weissg@...nna.at, philb@....org, linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org,
jkmaline@...hut.fi, paulus@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: Conversions from kmalloc+memset to k(z|c)alloc.
Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> Moment .. are you want to say something like "keep commont coding style
> can't be maintained by tool" ?
> Even if indent watches on to small coding style emenets still I don't
> see why using this tool isn't one of the current ement of release
> procedure (?).
indent isn't perfect, _especially_ where C99 comes into the picture.
And running indent across the tree pre-release would (a) create a ton of
noise before each release, and (b) undo perfectly valid, readable
formatting.
scripts/Lindent exists and gets used, but it is not perfect.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists