lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.BSO.4.63.0607222242100.10018@rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl>
Date:	Sat, 22 Jul 2006 22:55:55 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Tomasz Kłoczko <kloczek@...y.mif.pg.gda.pl>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
cc:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
	Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...Helsinki.FI>,
	Panagiotis Issaris <takis@....org>,
	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
	Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de>,
	Panagiotis Issaris <takis@...umba.uhasselt.be>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, len.brown@...el.com,
	chas@....nrl.navy.mil, miquel@...uba.ar, kkeil@...e.de,
	benh@...nel.crashing.org, video4linux-list@...hat.com,
	rmk+mmc@....linux.org.uk, Neela.Kolli@...enio.com,
	vandrove@...cvut.cz, adaplas@....net, thomas@...ischhofer.net,
	weissg@...nna.at, philb@....org, linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org,
	jkmaline@...hut.fi, paulus@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: Conversions from kmalloc+memset to k(z|c)alloc.

On Sat, 22 Jul 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>> Moment .. are you want to say something like "keep commont coding style 
>> can't be maintained by tool" ?
>> Even if indent watches on to small coding style emenets still I don't see 
>> why using this tool isn't one of the current ement of release procedure 
>> (?).
>
> indent isn't perfect, _especially_ where C99 comes into the picture.

Again: is in this case "isn't perfect" mean "it does not make all what we 
want" ? If yes still I don't see why not use indent + some other tool or 
if you will show real example where it does something badady (like now 
for checking code syntax is used compiler and some other tools like 
sparse).

> And running indent across the tree pre-release would (a) create a ton of 
> noise before each release, and (b) undo perfectly valid, readable formatting.

Committing all this "noise" will plug all this thing and allow reve most 
of content Documentation/CodingStyle document.
Is it not wort stop all questions/discuss/flames on this subject ?
Again: using indent mainly will mean only one time massive changes. After 
this ident can be runed for example by Linus just before make release and/or 
partial release.

> scripts/Lindent exists and gets used, but it is not perfect.

Again: anywhere are listed/was posted list of "not perfect" examples ? 
And/or: what does it mean in this case "not perfect" ? Show this  for 
allow start work on fix indent by other people (if all cases will be resul 
of some bugs in this tool).

kloczek
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
*Ludzie nie mają problemów, tylko sobie sami je stwarzają*
-----------------------------------------------------------
Tomasz Kłoczko, sys adm @zie.pg.gda.pl|*e-mail: kloczek@...y.mif.pg.gda.pl*

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ