| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:17:55 -0400 From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> To: Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <Linux-Kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Nikita Danilov <nikita@...sterfs.com>, Steve Lord <lord@....org> Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 05:38:53PM +0200, Olivier Galibert wrote: > I'm no talking about extends only. Ext3 now is very, very different > than the ext2+journal it was at the start, with backwards-incompatible > format changes added all the time[1]. These changes went in > no-questions-asked. The patches indeed were reviewed and changes made in response to the reviews. The philosophical/design question about whether or not optional features which, if enabled, would prevent older kernels to mount the filesystem was not asked, no. But that doesn't mean that the code was not reviewed; it was. I would also note that we didn't intimate that we knew better than the reviewers, or question their motives, or otherwise insult the reviewers such that they might decide they have better things to do than to review our patches, and that might have had something to do with how the code got in relatively painlessly.... - Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists