linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200607261234.k6QCY7Eb022487@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Wed, 26 Jul 2006 08:34:07 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
Cc:	Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2

On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:23:03 +0300, Al Boldi said:

> Running different scheds on a single RQ at the same time on the same resource
> would be rather odd.  That's why independent RQs are necessary even on SMP.
> OTOH, running independent RQs on UP doesn't make much sense, unless there is
> a way to relate them.

Exactly..

(But now I'm confused why you said SMP and UP were conceptually the same a
few notes back...)

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped