linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200607261704.35399.a1426z@gawab.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:04:35 +0300
From:	Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
To:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc:	Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2

Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:23:03 +0300, Al Boldi said:
> > Running different scheds on a single RQ at the same time on the same
> > resource would be rather odd.  That's why independent RQs are necessary
> > even on SMP. OTOH, running independent RQs on UP doesn't make much
> > sense, unless there is a way to relate them.
>
> Exactly..
>
> (But now I'm confused why you said SMP and UP were conceptually the same a
> few notes back...)

The important part here is 'unless there is a way to relate them', at which 
point UP and MP should be conceptually the same, while possibly differing in 
the implementation details.

Thanks!

--
Al


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/