[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200607270132.k6R1W7O4006409@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 21:32:07 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
Cc: Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:04:35 +0300, Al Boldi said:
> The important part here is 'unless there is a way to relate them', at which
> point UP and MP should be conceptually the same, while possibly differing in
> the implementation details.
Oh, OK. I think we're actually in agreement, just using different terms for
the same thing - what you were considering multiple related queues, I'd
consider one unified queue with subqueuing of some sort.. ;)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists