| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:06:14 +0100 From: Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio@...giomb.no-ip.org> To: Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Chris Wedgwood <cw@...f.org>, greg@...ah.com, jeff@...zik.org, harmon@....edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add SATA device to VIA IRQ quirk fixup list On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 14:59 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: > Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: > > I want put here something like: if ( dev->irq != XT-PIC) return and > > don't quirk this dev. > > I can't explain why, but this is not sufficient. Gentoo now have 2 > completely separate bug reports where the quirk is *only* needed when > ACPI/APIC are enabled. > No, Quirks are only need when interrupts are in XT-PIC. (is my bet). When APIC and ACPI is enabled (and working) we don't need quirks. Someone said on XT-PIC VIA system, don't need, to boot, quirks when ACPI is disabled, but this statement don't prove that the quirk aren't need it . -- Sérgio M. B. > http://bugs.gentoo.org/138036 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/141082 > > I'm not disputing that there are other systems where the opposite is > true, but at least with our current level of understanding we cannot > apply the quirk on an irq-type basis. > > Daniel > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists