[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1153922774.4486.7.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:06:14 +0100
From: Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio@...giomb.no-ip.org>
To: Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Chris Wedgwood <cw@...f.org>, greg@...ah.com, jeff@...zik.org,
harmon@....edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add SATA device to VIA IRQ quirk fixup list
On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 14:59 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> > I want put here something like: if ( dev->irq != XT-PIC) return and
> > don't quirk this dev.
>
> I can't explain why, but this is not sufficient. Gentoo now have 2
> completely separate bug reports where the quirk is *only* needed when
> ACPI/APIC are enabled.
>
No, Quirks are only need when interrupts are in XT-PIC. (is my bet).
When APIC and ACPI is enabled (and working) we don't need quirks.
Someone said on XT-PIC VIA system, don't need, to boot, quirks when ACPI
is disabled, but this statement don't prove that the quirk aren't need
it .
--
Sérgio M. B.
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/138036
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/141082
>
> I'm not disputing that there are other systems where the opposite is
> true, but at least with our current level of understanding we cannot
> apply the quirk on an irq-type basis.
>
> Daniel
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists