linux-kernel - Re: [3/4] kevent: AIO, aio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <44C77C23.7000803@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Jul 2006 07:28:51 -0700
From:	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [3/4] kevent: AIO, aio_sendfile() implementation.

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> My personal opinion on existing AIO is that it is not the right design.
>> Benjamin LaHaise agree with me (if I understood him right),
> 
> I completely agree with that aswell.

I agree, too, but the current code is not the last of the line.  Suparna
has a st of patches which make the current kernel aio code work much
better and especially make it really usable to implement POSIX AIO.

In Ottawa we were talking about submitting it and Suparna will.  We just
thought about a little longer timeframe.  I guess it could be
accelerated since he mostly has the patch done.  But I don't know her
schedule.

Important here is, don't base any decision on the current aio
implementation.

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (252 bytes)