linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0607281849000.4972@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date:	Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:57:33 +0200 (MEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
cc:	ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...l.org, jeff@...zik.org, adobriyan@...il.com,
	vlobanov@...akeasy.net, getshorty_@...mail.com,
	pwil3058@...pond.net.au, mb@...sch.de, penberg@...helsinki.fi,
	stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de, larsbj@...lik.net
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6)

>I'm delighted that this favors "true, false and bool",
>over "TRUE, FALSE and various spellings of BOOLEAN".
>
>Fun stuff to do in the future:

Make people actually accept bool.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/1/123 was like a hit in the face wrt. bool.


PS: Can *anybody* tell me why lkml.org is so slow recently?


Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/