[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060728202401.GA24439@lars.home.noschinski.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 22:24:01 +0200
From: Lars Noschinski <cebewee@....de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>, ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Vadim Lobanov <vlobanov@...akeasy.net>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6)
* Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> [2006-07-28 22:14]:
>Ar Iau, 2006-07-27 am 13:13 -0700, ysgrifennodd Nicholas Miell:
>> The compiler knows that "b = !!b;" is a no-op.
>
>b = !!b isn't a no-op.
For _Bool it should be:
>Try printf("%d", !!4);
printf("%d, %d", (_Bool)4, !!(_Bool)4);
prints "1, 1". From ISO/IEC 9899:1999:
When any scalar value is converted to _Bool, the result is 0 if the
value compares equal to 0; otherwise, the result is 1.
Greetings,
Lars
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists