linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i386: Do backtrace fallback too

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:13:18 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: Do backtrace fallback too

On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 07:03:10PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
 > 
 > >  > > 	print_symbol("DWARF2 unwinder stuck at %s\n",
 > >  > > 		UNW_PC(info.regs));
 > >  > >
 > >  > > be using %p ?
 > >  >
 > >  > Yes good catch.
 > >
 > > The x86-64 equivalent also has an instance of the same bug.
 > 
 > Actually on double checking the %s is correct because it's print_symbol

Ah, of course. Somehow I missed that on two separate readings of the code.

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/