linux-kernel - Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <44CBA99F.2040306@slaphack.com>
Date:	Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:31:59 -0500
From:	David Masover <ninja@...phack.com>
To:	Nikita Danilov <nikita@...sterfs.com>
CC:	Hans Reiser <reiser@...esys.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	"Horst H. von Brand" <vonbrand@....utfsm.cl>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ReiserFS List <reiserfs-list@...esys.com>
Subject: Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed
 by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion)

Nikita Danilov wrote:

> As you see, ext2 code already has multiple file "plugins", with
> persistent "plugin id" (stored in i_mode field of on-disk struct
> ext2_inode).

Aha!  So here's another question:  Is it fair to ask Reiser4 to make its
plugins generic, or should we be asking ext2/3 first?


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (891 bytes)