[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060730105228.GA5810@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 12:52:28 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] Begin abstraction of sensitive instructions: asm files
On Sat 2006-07-22 10:14:34, Rusty Russell wrote:
> (forgot to send this to lkml before)
>
> Abstract sensitive instructions in assembler code, replacing them with
> macros (which currently are #defined to the native versions). We use
> long names: assembler is case-insensitive, so if something goes wrong
> and macros do not expand, it would assemble anyway.
>
> Resulting object files are exactly the same as before.
>
> Signed-off-by Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
>
> Index: working-2.6.18-rc2-hg-paravirt/arch/i386/kernel/entry.S
> ===================================================================
> --- working-2.6.18-rc2-hg-paravirt.orig/arch/i386/kernel/entry.S 2006-07-21 21:09:22.000000000 +1000
> +++ working-2.6.18-rc2-hg-paravirt/arch/i386/kernel/entry.S 2006-07-22 04:32:25.000000000 +1000
> @@ -76,8 +76,15 @@
> NT_MASK = 0x00004000
> VM_MASK = 0x00020000
>
> +/* These are replaces for paravirtualization */
> +#define DISABLE_INTERRUPTS cli
> +#define ENABLE_INTERRUPTS sti
> +#define ENABLE_INTERRUPTS_SYSEXIT sti; sysexit
> +#define INTERRUPT_RETURN iret
Could we use some less verbose names, like possibly CLI, STI,
STI_SYSEXIT, IRET ?
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists