| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 18:13:01 +0200
From: Thomas Ilnseher <illth@....de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: GPL violation
Hello.
I wanted to inform you about a possible linux kernel GPL violation.
I have bought an ALLNET ALL6250 Network Attached Storage device
some months ago. This device is obviously linux based.
Some days ago, they released the "sources". (do not trust the dates on
their homepage!)
they can be found here:
http://www.allnet.de/ftp/pub/allnet/nas/all6250/
the files in charge are :
ALL6250_GPL.tgz <http://www.allnet.de/ftp/pub/allnet/nas/all6250/ALL6250_GPL.tgz>
and
ALL6250_GPL_V1.10.tgz <http://www.allnet.de/ftp/pub/allnet/nas/all6250/ALL6250_GPL_V1.10.tgz>
they both contain a vanilla (!) 2.4.24 kernel archive:
tom:~/NAS/sources> diff -uNr linux-2.4.24/ ALT/NH230/linux-2.4.24/
tom:~/NAS/sources>
where linux-2.4.24 is the vanilla 2.4.24 kernel tree from www.kernel.org.
However, i have managed to get some shell access to that device, and get
it's dmesg output
(attached to this mail).
this clearly shows that:
the firmware is based upon 2.4.21(as opposed to 2.4.24)
and has some modification to run on that hardware.
i have grepped the linux tree for strings
"Premier Microelectronics Development", "NH230", "NH200" "_gpio" and so on,
but could not find anything.
I am pretty much pissed off now as that mans i still can't upgrade the
box to support NFS :(
sincerly,
Thomas Ilnseher
PS: I'm not signed up to the LKML, so please CC me.
View attachment "dmesg.txt" of type "text/plain" (5341 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists