[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44CE7986.80109@slaphack.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:43:34 -0500
From: David Masover <ninja@...phack.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@...il.com>,
Clay Barnes <clay.barnes@...il.com>,
Rudy Zijlstra <rudy@...ons.demon.nl>,
Adrian Ulrich <reiser4@...nkenlights.ch>,
vonbrand@....utfsm.cl, ipso@...ppymail.ca, reiser@...esys.com,
lkml@...productions.com, jeff@...zik.org, tytso@....edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@...esys.com
Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org
regarding reiser4 inclusion
Alan Cox wrote:
> Ar Llu, 2006-07-31 am 17:00 -0400, ysgrifennodd Gregory Maxwell:
>> Are you sure that you aren't commenting on cases where Reiser3 alerts
>> the user to a critical data condition (via a panic) which leads to a
>> trouble report while ext3 ignores the problem which suppresses the
>> trouble report from the user?
>
> man mount
>
> Ext3 is configurable, and has been for years via the errors= option.
Sure, but I think the suggestion is that the reason we generally see
more ReiserFS complaints than ext3 complaints might be because of the
default level of errors logged.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists