linux-kernel - [PATCH] acpi/uevents: remove dock uevents

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20060801145919.1496fd83.kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:59:19 -0700
From:	Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@...el.com>
To:	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	len.brown@...el.com, greg@...ah.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] acpi/uevents: remove dock uevents

Remove uevent dock notifications.  There are no consumers
of these events at present, and uevents are likely not the
correct way to send this type of event anyway.

Until I get some kind of idea if anyone in userspace cares
about dock events, I will just not send any.

Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@...el.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/dock.c     |   13 ++++++-------
 include/linux/kobject.h |    2 --
 lib/kobject_uevent.c    |    4 ----
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

--- 2.6-git.orig/drivers/acpi/dock.c
+++ 2.6-git/drivers/acpi/dock.c
@@ -58,8 +58,8 @@ struct dock_dependent_device {
 };
 
 #define DOCK_DOCKING	0x00000001
-#define DOCK_EVENT	KOBJ_DOCK
-#define UNDOCK_EVENT	KOBJ_UNDOCK
+#define DOCK_EVENT	3
+#define UNDOCK_EVENT	2
 
 static struct dock_station *dock_station;
 
@@ -322,11 +322,10 @@ static void hotplug_dock_devices(struct 
 
 static void dock_event(struct dock_station *ds, u32 event, int num)
 {
-	struct acpi_device *device;
-
-	device = dock_create_acpi_device(ds->handle);
-	if (device)
-		kobject_uevent(&device->kobj, num);
+	/*
+	 * we don't do events until someone tells me that
+	 * they would like to have them.
+	 */
 }
 
 /**
--- 2.6-git.orig/include/linux/kobject.h
+++ 2.6-git/include/linux/kobject.h
@@ -46,8 +46,6 @@ enum kobject_action {
 	KOBJ_UMOUNT	= (__force kobject_action_t) 0x05,	/* umount event for block devices (broken) */
 	KOBJ_OFFLINE	= (__force kobject_action_t) 0x06,	/* device offline */
 	KOBJ_ONLINE	= (__force kobject_action_t) 0x07,	/* device online */
-	KOBJ_UNDOCK	= (__force kobject_action_t) 0x08, 	/* undocking */
-	KOBJ_DOCK	= (__force kobject_action_t) 0x09,	/* dock */
 };
 
 struct kobject {
--- 2.6-git.orig/lib/kobject_uevent.c
+++ 2.6-git/lib/kobject_uevent.c
@@ -50,10 +50,6 @@ static char *action_to_string(enum kobje
 		return "offline";
 	case KOBJ_ONLINE:
 		return "online";
-	case KOBJ_DOCK:
-		return "dock";
-	case KOBJ_UNDOCK:
-		return "undock";
 	default:
 		return NULL;
 	}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/