[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3ejvzqkjf.fsf@defiant.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 16:28:20 +0200
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>
Cc: Ian Stirling <ian.stirling@...ve.plus.com>,
David Masover <ninja@...phack.com>,
David Lang <dlang@...italinsight.com>,
Nate Diller <nate.diller@...il.com>,
Adrian Ulrich <reiser4@...nkenlights.ch>,
"Horst H. von Brand" <vonbrand@....utfsm.cl>, ipso@...ppymail.ca,
lkml@...productions.com, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
LKML Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
reiserfs-list@...esys.com
Subject: Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux
Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com> writes:
> IMHO the best alternative for a situation like that is a storage
> controller with a battery-backed cache and a hunk of flash NVRAM for
> when the power shuts off (just in case you run out of battery), as
> well as a separate 1GB battery-backed PCI ramdisk for an external
> journal device (likewise equipped with flash NVRAM). It doesn't take
> much power at all to write a gig of stuff to a small flash chip
> (Think about your digital camera which runs off a couple AA's), so
> with a fair-sized on-board battery pack you could easily transfer its
> data to NVRAM and still have power left to back up data in RAM for 12
> hours or so. That way bootup is fast (no reading 1GB of data from
> NVRAM) but there's no risk of data loss.
Not sure - reading flash is fast, but writing is quite slow.
A digital camera can consume a set of 2 or 4 2500 mAh AA cells
for a fraction of 1 GB (of course, only a part of power goes
to flash).
--
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists