[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060802143046.GA5645@kenny>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 22:30:46 +0800
From: Kenneth Lee <kenlee@...gov.cn>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Patch] kernel: bug fixing for kernel/kmod.c
I think there is a bug in kmod.c: In __call_usermodehelper(), when
kernel_thread(wait_for_helper, ...) return success, since
wait_for_helper() might call complete() at any time, the sub_info should
not be used any more.
Normally wait_for_helper() take a long time to finish, you may not get
problem for most of the case. But if you remove /sbin/modprobe, it may
become easier for you to get a oop in khelper.
the following patch is made in 2.6.17.7
--- linux-2.6.17.7/kernel/kmod.c.orig 2006-08-02 22:13:21.805902750
+0800
+++ linux-2.6.17.7/kernel/kmod.c 2006-08-02 22:15:36.946348500
+0800
@@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ static void __call_usermodehelper(void *
{
struct subprocess_info *sub_info = data;
pid_t pid;
+ int wait = sub_info->wait;
/* CLONE_VFORK: wait until the usermode helper has execve'd
* successfully We need the data structures to stay around
@@ -212,7 +213,7 @@ static void __call_usermodehelper(void *
if (pid < 0) {
sub_info->retval = pid;
complete(sub_info->complete);
- } else if (!sub_info->wait)
+ } else if (!wait)
complete(sub_info->complete);
}
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists