[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060802144259.GA5827@kenny>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 22:42:59 +0800
From: Kenneth Lee <kenlee@...gov.cn>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] kernel: bug fixing for kernel/kmod.c
Mr. Rusty Russell's mail server reject my mail. Anybody can tell me
where I should deliver the patch?
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 10:30:46PM +0800, Kenneth Lee wrote:
> Subject: [Patch] kernel: bug fixing for kernel/kmod.c
>
> I think there is a bug in kmod.c: In __call_usermodehelper(), when
> kernel_thread(wait_for_helper, ...) return success, since
> wait_for_helper() might call complete() at any time, the sub_info should
> not be used any more.
>
> Normally wait_for_helper() take a long time to finish, you may not get
> problem for most of the case. But if you remove /sbin/modprobe, it may
> become easier for you to get a oop in khelper.
>
> the following patch is made in 2.6.17.7
>
> --- linux-2.6.17.7/kernel/kmod.c.orig 2006-08-02 22:13:21.805902750
> +0800
> +++ linux-2.6.17.7/kernel/kmod.c 2006-08-02 22:15:36.946348500
> +0800
> @@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ static void __call_usermodehelper(void *
> {
> struct subprocess_info *sub_info = data;
> pid_t pid;
> + int wait = sub_info->wait;
>
> /* CLONE_VFORK: wait until the usermode helper has execve'd
> * successfully We need the data structures to stay around
> @@ -212,7 +213,7 @@ static void __call_usermodehelper(void *
> if (pid < 0) {
> sub_info->retval = pid;
> complete(sub_info->complete);
> - } else if (!sub_info->wait)
> + } else if (!wait)
> complete(sub_info->complete);
> }
>
> --
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists