linux-kernel - Re: [Patch] kernel: bug fixing for kernel/kmod.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1154569960.21787.2774.camel@stark>
Date:	Wed, 02 Aug 2006 18:52:40 -0700
From:	Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
To:	Kenneth Lee <kenlee@...gov.cn>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] kernel: bug fixing for kernel/kmod.c

On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 22:30 +0800, Kenneth Lee wrote:
> I think there is a bug in kmod.c: In __call_usermodehelper(), when 
> kernel_thread(wait_for_helper, ...) return success, since
> wait_for_helper() might call complete() at any time, the sub_info should
> not be used any more.
> 
> Normally wait_for_helper() take a long time to finish, you may not get 
> problem for most of the case. But if you remove /sbin/modprobe, it may
> become easier for you to get a oop in khelper.
> 
> the following patch is made in 2.6.17.7
> 
> --- linux-2.6.17.7/kernel/kmod.c.orig   2006-08-02 22:13:21.805902750
> +0800
> +++ linux-2.6.17.7/kernel/kmod.c        2006-08-02 22:15:36.946348500
> +0800
> @@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ static void __call_usermodehelper(void *
>  {
>         struct subprocess_info *sub_info = data;
>         pid_t pid;
> +       int wait = sub_info->wait;
> 
>         /* CLONE_VFORK: wait until the usermode helper has execve'd
>          * successfully We need the data structures to stay around
> @@ -212,7 +213,7 @@ static void __call_usermodehelper(void *
>         if (pid < 0) {
>                 sub_info->retval = pid;
>                 complete(sub_info->complete);
> -       } else if (!sub_info->wait)
> +       } else if (!wait)
>                 complete(sub_info->complete);
>  }
> 

Looks like a correct fix for the race to me. I think you'd make the code
slightly easier to read by replacing the initial test too:

if (sub_info->wait)
	pid = kernel_thread(...

with:

if (wait)
	pid = kernel_thread(...

Cheers,
	-Matt Helsley

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/