linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] ELF Relocatable x86 and x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 01 Aug 2006 20:40:58 -0600
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	vgoyal@...ibm.com
Cc:	fastboot@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Horms <horms@...ge.net.au>,
	Jan Kratochvil <lace@...kratochvil.net>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	Linda Wang <lwang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ELF Relocatable x86 and x86_64 bzImages

Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com> writes:

> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 04:58:49AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> 
>> Currently there are 33 patches in my tree to do this.
>> 
>> The weirdest symptom I have had so far is that page faults did not
>> trigger the early exception handler on x86_64 (instead I got a reboot).
>> 
>> There is one outstanding issue where I am probably requiring too much
> alignment
>> on the arch/i386 kernel.  
>> 
>> Can anyone find anything else?
>>
>
> I am running into compilation failure on x86_64.

I'm not quite certain what is wrong, except that you haven't
applied all of my patches.

The x86_64 ones do depend on the i386 ones to some extent.
That is why it was one giant patchset.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/