linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] irqbalance: Mark in-kernel irqbalance as obsolete, set to N by default

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <44D358C6.3080406@intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 04 Aug 2006 07:25:10 -0700
From:	Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
CC:	Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, john.ronciak@...el.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, arjan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] irqbalance: Mark in-kernel irqbalance as obsolete, set
 to N by default

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:35:26 -0700
> Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com> wrote:
> 
>> We've recently seen a number of user bug reports against e1000 that the 
>> in-kernel irqbalance code is detrimental to network latency. The algorithm 
>> keeps swapping irq's for NICs from cpu to cpu causing extremely high network 
>> latency (>1000ms).
> 
> What kernel versions?  Some IRQ balancer fixes went in shortly after 2.6.17.

user reports show 2.6.17.1 having the problem, I'm trying to get more details 
information, and will ask if 2.6.18rc3 or so does better for them.

Cheers,

Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/