[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608040730430.16814@montezuma.fsmlabs.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 07:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>
To: Greg Banks <gnb@...bourne.sgi.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH 2 of 4] cpumask: export cpu_online_map and cpu_possible_map
consistently
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Greg Banks wrote:
> cpumask: ensure that the cpu_online_map and cpu_possible_map bitmasks,
> and hence all the macros in <linux/cpumask.h> that require them, are
> available to modules for all supported combinations of architecture
> and CONFIG_SMP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Banks <gnb@...bourne.sgi.com>
> ---
>
> arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 2 ++
> arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/smp.c | 1 +
> arch/sh/kernel/smp.c | 1 +
> kernel/sched.c | 3 +++
> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.18-rc2/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.18-rc2.orig/kernel/sched.c 2006-08-01 17:53:25.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-2.6.18-rc2/kernel/sched.c 2006-08-02 23:01:20.535457863 +1000
> @@ -4348,7 +4348,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_present_map);
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_SMP
> cpumask_t cpu_online_map __read_mostly = CPU_MASK_ALL;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_online_map);
> cpumask_t cpu_possible_map;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_possible_map);
> cpumask_t cpu_online_map;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_online_map);
How come these are of different export types?
Cheers,
Zwane
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists