linux-kernel - Re: Checksumming blocks? [was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <44D3B36F.7010501@slaphack.com>
Date:	Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:51:59 -0400
From:	David Masover <ninja@...phack.com>
To:	Russell Leighton <russ@...gant-software.com>
CC:	Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@....de>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Adrian Ulrich <reiser4@...nkenlights.ch>,
	"Horst H. von Brand" <vonbrand@....utfsm.cl>,
	bernd-schubert@....de, reiserfs-list@...esys.com,
	jbglaw@...-owl.de, clay.barnes@...il.com, rudy@...ons.demon.nl,
	ipso@...ppymail.ca, reiser@...esys.com, lkml@...productions.com,
	jeff@...zik.org, tytso@....edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Checksumming blocks? [was Re: the " 'official' point of view"
 expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]

Russell Leighton wrote:

> Is there a recovery mechanism, or do you just be happy you know there is 
> a problem (and go to backup)?

You probably go to backup anyway.  The recovery mechanism just means you 
get to choose the downtime to restore from backup (if there is 
downtime), versus being suddenly down until you can restore.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/