[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1G96ds-0000ht-HT@be1.lrz>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 22:51:15 +0200
From: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@...tempel.de>
To: Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
Jes Sorensen <jes@....com> wrote:
> Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Try determining the alignment of u64 on i386. You will be surprised.
>
> If thats the case, then thats really scary :-( I'd claim it's a bug and
> I am willing to be that iptables isn't the only place that is affected
> or will be in the future.
It's not a bug, since 64 bit integers require only 4-byte-alignment if
addressed by the CPU/FPU. You may benefit from cacheline effects if you
align to 64 bits, but not on i[34]86 (and those define the ABI).
If you want 64-bit-alignment, you can use -malign-double.
--
Ich danke GMX dafür, die Verwendung meiner Adressen mittels per SPF
verbreiteten Lügen zu sabotieren.
http://david.woodhou.se/why-not-spf.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists