linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] memory hotadd fixes [6/5] enhance collistion check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:01:16 -0700
From:	keith mannthey <kmannth@...ibm.com>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	andrew <akpm@...l.org>, y-goto@...fujitsu.com,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	lhms-devel <lhms-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memory hotadd fixes [6/5] enhance collistion check

On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 11:32 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> Okay... here is 6/5 patch..
> 
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:15:50 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote: 
> > > > Maybe moving ioresouce collision check in early stage of add_memory() is good ?
> > >   Yea.  I am working a a full patch set for but my sparsemem and reserve
> > > add-based paths.  It creates a valid_memory_add_range call at the start
> > > of add_memory. I should be posting the set in the next few hours.
> > > 
> > Ah..ok. but I wrote my own patch...and testing it now..
> > 
> 
> This patch passed test with ia64. based on 5 patches already sent.
> plz check. 

Looks good to me.  Tested as works x86_64. It is required for the 4th
patch of this series. 

Acked-by: Keith Mannthey <kmannth@...ibm.com>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/