[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1155051876.5729.93.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 16:44:36 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...hat.com, sds@...ho.nsa.gov,
jack@...e.cz, dwmw2@...radead.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
jdike@...aya.com, James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com
Subject: Re: How to lock current->signal->tty
Ar Maw, 2006-08-08 am 08:10 -0700, ysgrifennodd Arjan van de Ven:
> > Unfortunately:
> > Dquot passes the tty to tty_write_message without locking
> > arch/ia64/kernel/unanligned seems to write to it without locking
>
> these two have absolutely no business at all using anything tty.... they should
> just use printk with KERN_EMERG or whatever
Dquot does - it writes to the controlling tty of the process exceeding
quota . That is standard Unix behaviour
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists