linux-kernel - Re: Time to forbid non-subscribers from posting to the list?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060809085149.GB27939@merlin.emma.line.org>
Date:	Wed, 9 Aug 2006 10:51:49 +0200
From:	Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@....de>
To:	jdow <jdow@...thlink.net>
Cc:	davids@...master.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Time to forbid non-subscribers from posting to the list?

On Tue, 08 Aug 2006, jdow wrote:

> If you have the luxury of the ability to write personalized rules and
> whitelist entries for SpamAssassin it can become a startlingly good
> filtering system. And you can tailor the filtering for individual 
> sources with meta rules. Processing large numbers of messages through
> BAYES and large numbers of rules gets quite time consuming, perhaps

Bayes and distributed filtering in SpamAssassin, although it integrates
nicely with the scoring, is so painfully slow that I've ditched it after
a short test drive. Systems such as bogofilter, spamprobe or qsf are way
faster - and can also look at tags that SpamAssassin (in local non-bayes
mode) may have added to the header.

-- 
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/