linux-kernel - Re: Time to forbid non-subscribers from posting to the list?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060809112255.GC4373@harddisk-recovery.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Aug 2006 13:22:55 +0200
From:	Erik Mouw <erik@...ddisk-recovery.com>
To:	jdow <jdow@...thlink.net>, davids@...master.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Time to forbid non-subscribers from posting to the list?

On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 10:51:49AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Bayes and distributed filtering in SpamAssassin, although it integrates
> nicely with the scoring, is so painfully slow that I've ditched it after
> a short test drive. Systems such as bogofilter, spamprobe or qsf are way
> faster - and can also look at tags that SpamAssassin (in local non-bayes
> mode) may have added to the header.

Spamassassin is slow if you call it at every message cause the Perl
startup and init is quite expensive. If you run the spamassassin daemon
(spamd) and use the spamassassin client (spamc) it's a lot faster.

Over here it can cope with lots of mailing list traffic and even more
spam (>30000 messages a day on an Athlon 2400+).


Erik

-- 
+-- Erik Mouw -- www.harddisk-recovery.com -- +31 70 370 12 90 --
| Lab address: Delftechpark 26, 2628 XH, Delft, The Netherlands
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/