linux-kernel - Alpha: replacing "extern inline"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060820235438.GY7813@stusta.de>
Date:	Mon, 21 Aug 2006 01:54:38 +0200
From:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To:	rth@...ddle.net
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Alpha: replacing "extern inline"

I want to get rid of all "extern inline" in the kernel.

Why?
"extern inline" generates a warning with -Wmissing-prototypes and I'm 
currently working on getting the kernel cleaned up for adding this to 
the CFLAGS since it will help us to avoid a nasty class of runtime 
errors.

"extern inline" was required at the times when 
__attribute__((always_inline)) wasn't avalable.

Nowadays, we use "static inline", and if there are places that really 
need a forced inline, we use "static __always_inline".

Can someone tell me which of the Alpha "static inline"'s need for some 
reason an __always_inline?

And a related question:
Does the never defined __IO_EXTERN_INLINE still have any purpose?

cu
Adrian

-- 

    Gentoo kernels are 42 times more popular than SUSE kernels among
    KLive users  (a service by SUSE contractor Andrea Arcangeli that
    gathers data about kernels from many users worldwide).

       There are three kinds of lies: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics.
                                                    Benjamin Disraeli

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/