| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:55:26 -0700 From: Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net> To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Alpha: replacing "extern inline" On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 01:54:38AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Why? Because it inlines when it needs to, and does not generate out of line code when its address is taken. > Can someone tell me which of the Alpha "static inline"'s need for some > reason an __always_inline? There shouldn't be any. > Does the never defined __IO_EXTERN_INLINE still have any purpose? It is defined. $ grep 'define __IO_EXTERN_INLINE' * | wc -l 12 r~ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists