linux-kernel - Re: Alpha: replacing "extern inline"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060823225303.GD19810@stusta.de>
Date:	Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:53:03 +0200
From:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Alpha: replacing "extern inline"

On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 02:55:26PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 01:54:38AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Why?
> 
> Because it inlines when it needs to, and does not generate
> out of line code when its address is taken.

Ah, I start to remember.

Is this actually used anywhere in the kernel?

> > Can someone tell me which of the Alpha "static inline"'s need for some 
> > reason an __always_inline?
> 
> There shouldn't be any.
> 
> > Does the never defined __IO_EXTERN_INLINE still have any purpose?
> 
> It is defined.
> 
> $ grep 'define __IO_EXTERN_INLINE' * | wc -l
> 12

Ups, I was blind...

> r~

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/