[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060820145321.GA775@oleg>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:53:21 +0400
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...e.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] copy_process: cosmetic ->ioprio tweak
copy_process:
// holds tasklist_lock + ->siglock
/*
* inherit ioprio
*/
p->ioprio = current->ioprio;
Why? ->ioprio was already copied in dup_task_struct(). I guess this is needed
to ensure that the child can't escape sys_ioprio_set(IOPRIO_WHO_{PGRP,USER}),
yes?
In that case we don't need ->siglock held, and the comment should be updated.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
--- 2.6.18-rc4/kernel/fork.c~1_fork 2006-08-19 17:50:56.000000000 +0400
+++ 2.6.18-rc4/kernel/fork.c 2006-08-20 18:18:47.000000000 +0400
@@ -1138,7 +1138,6 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
/* Our parent execution domain becomes current domain
These must match for thread signalling to apply */
-
p->parent_exec_id = p->self_exec_id;
/* ok, now we should be set up.. */
@@ -1161,6 +1160,9 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
/* Need tasklist lock for parent etc handling! */
write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
+ /* for sys_ioprio_set(IOPRIO_WHO_PGRP) */
+ p->ioprio = current->ioprio;
+
/*
* The task hasn't been attached yet, so its cpus_allowed mask will
* not be changed, nor will its assigned CPU.
@@ -1220,11 +1222,6 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
}
}
- /*
- * inherit ioprio
- */
- p->ioprio = current->ioprio;
-
if (likely(p->pid)) {
add_parent(p);
if (unlikely(p->ptrace & PT_PTRACED))
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists