linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4-mm2] Generic boolean (was: Re: Generic booleans in -mm)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0608231403280.14327@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date:	Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:06:10 +0200 (MEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Prajakta Gudadhe <pgudadhe@...dia.com>, jeff@...zik.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4-mm2] Generic boolean (was: Re: Generic booleans
 in -mm)

Hi,


> There has been concern about adding other values then 0 and 1. There has been
> ideas to do something like:
> bool b = i & 1 : 0;

I think you miseed a '?'

bool b = (i & 1) ? : 0;

> /*or*/
> bool b = !!i;
>
> but all that is needed is just a casting:
>
> bool b = (bool) i;

No casting needed (in fact, casting is more evil than !!). If bool is a
bool, then the compiler will (hopefully) ensure that b will only get
values valid for bools.

$ cat x.c
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <stdio.h>

int main(int argc, const char **argv) {
    _Bool b = argc;
    printf("%d\n", (int)b);
    return 0;
}
$ ./a.out 
1



Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/