[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060823151439.a44aa13f.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:14:39 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...nkl.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eranian@....hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/18] 2.6.17.9 perfmon2 patch for review: new system
calls support
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 01:05:55 -0700
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...nkl.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
> This patch contains the perfmon2 system call interface.
>
> The interface consist of 12 new system calls. The front-end
> of each system call is implemented in perfmon_syscall.c.
> The front-end takes care of copying the parameters into
> kernel structures and also verifies that the perfmon state
> is appropriate for each command. The back-end of each syscall
> is implemented either in the core (perfmon.c) or in feature
> specific file (e.g. perfmon_sets.c).
>
> The system calls are defined as follows:
>
> sys_pfm_create_context():
> - create a new perfmon2 context and returns a file descriptor in
> the pfarg_ctx_t parameters. This is the first call an application
> must make to do monitoring
>
> sys_pfm_write_pmcs():
> - program the PMU configuration registers. Accepts vector of arguments
> of type pfarg_pmc_t
>
> sys_pfm_write_pmds():
> - program the PMU data registers. Accepts a vector of arguments of type
> pfarg_pmd_t
>
> sys_pfm_read_pmds():
> - read the PMU data registers. Accepts a vector of arguments of type
> pfarg_pmd_t
>
> sys_pfm_restart():
> - indicate that application is doing processing an overflow notification
>
> sys_pfm_start():
> - start monitoring
>
> sys_pfm_stop():
> - stop monitoring
>
> sys_pfm_load_context():
> - attach a perfmon2 context to a task or the current processor.
>
> sys_pfm_unload_context():
> - detach the perfmon2 context
>
> sys_pfm_create_evtsets():
> - create or change an event sets. By default a context is created with only one
> set
>
> sys_pfm_delete_evtsets():
> - delete any explicitely created event set
>
> sys_pfm_getinfo_evtsets():
> - get information about event sets, such as the number of activations. Accepts
> vector arguments of type pfarg_setinfo_t
>
> There are other more indirect system calls related to the fact that a context uses a file
> descriptor. Those system calls are in perfmon_file.c and part of another patch.
>
This code does quite a lot of worrisome poking around inside task lifetime
internals.
Perhaps you could describe what problems are being solved here so we can
take a closer look at whether this is the best way in which to solve them?
> + /*
> + * for syswide, we accept if running on the cpu the context is bound
> + * to. When monitoring another thread, must wait until stopped.
> + */
> + if (ctx->flags.system) {
> + if (ctx->cpu != smp_processor_id())
> + return -EBUSY;
> + return 0;
> + }
Hopefully we're running atomically here. Inside preempt_disable().
> +
> + PFM_DBG("going wait_inactive for [%d] state=%ld flags=0x%lx",
> + task->pid,
> + task->state,
> + local_flags);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, local_flags);
> +
> + wait_task_inactive(task);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, new_flags);
This sort of thing..
> +
> +int pfm_get_args(void __user *ureq, size_t sz, size_t max_sz, void *laddr,
> + void **req)
> +{
> + void *addr;
> +
> + if (sz <= max_sz) {
> + *req = laddr;
> + return copy_from_user(laddr, ureq, sz);
> + }
> +
> + if (unlikely(sz > pfm_controls.arg_size_max)) {
> + PFM_DBG("argument too big %zu max=%zu",
> + sz,
> + pfm_controls.arg_size_max);
> + return -E2BIG;
> + }
> +
> + addr = kmalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (unlikely(addr == NULL))
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(addr, ureq, sz)) {
> + kfree(addr);
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> + *req = addr;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Did you really want to return the copy_from_user() return value here? Or
should it be returning
copy_from_user(laddr, ureq, sz) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> +/*
> + * function invoked in case, pfm_context_create fails
> + * at the last operation, copy_to_user. It needs to
> + * undo memory allocations and free the file descriptor
> + */
> +#ifndef CONFIG_IA64_PERFMON_COMPAT
> +static
> +#endif
> +void pfm_undo_create_context_fd(int fd, struct pfm_context *ctx)
> +{
> + struct files_struct *files = current->files;
> + struct file *file;
> +
> + file = fget(fd);
> + /*
> + * there is no fd_uninstall(), so we do it
> + * here. put_unused_fd() does not remove the
> + * effect of fd_install().
> + */
> +
> + spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
> + files->fd_array[fd] = NULL;
> + spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
> +
> + /*
> + * undo the fget()
> + */
> + fput(file);
> +
> + /*
> + * decrement ref count and kill file
> + */
> + put_filp(file);
> +
> + put_unused_fd(fd);
> +
> + pfm_context_free(ctx);
> +}
There are a few places in here which could use fget_light().
> +asmlinkage long sys_pfm_write_pmcs(int fd, struct pfarg_pmc __user *ureq, int count)
> +{
> + struct pfm_context *ctx;
> + struct pfarg_pmc pmcs[PFM_PMC_STK_ARG];
> + struct pfarg_pmc *req;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + size_t sz;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (count < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ctx = pfm_get_ctx(fd);
> + if (unlikely(ctx == NULL))
> + return -EBADF;
> +
> + sz = count*sizeof(*ureq);
I'm worried about multiplication overflow here. A large value of `count'
can cause `count*sizeof(*ureq)' to yield a small positive result. It
appears that very bad things might happen.
> + ret = pfm_get_args(ureq, sz, sizeof(pmcs), pmcs, (void **)&req);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, flags);
> +
> + ret = pfm_check_task_state(ctx, PFM_CMD_STOPPED, &flags);
> + if (!ret)
> + ret = __pfm_write_pmcs(ctx, req, count);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
> +
> + if (copy_to_user(ureq, req, sz))
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> +
> + if (count > PFM_PMC_STK_ARG)
> + kfree(req);
That's rather obscure. This code is basically paralleling the arithmetic in
pfm_get_args(). I'd suggest that it would be cleaner to pass another arg
to pfm_get_args(): void **pointer_to_free, and fill that in if
pfm_get_args() did kmalloc:
ret = pfm_get_args(ureq, sz, sizeof(pmcs), pmcs, (void **)&req,
&pointer_to_free);
...
kfree(pointer_to_free);
> +asmlinkage long sys_pfm_write_pmds(int fd, struct pfarg_pmd __user *ureq, int count)
> +{
> + struct pfm_context *ctx;
> + struct pfarg_pmd pmds[PFM_PMD_STK_ARG];
> + struct pfarg_pmd *req;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + size_t sz;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (count < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ctx = pfm_get_ctx(fd);
> + if (unlikely(ctx == NULL))
> + return -EBADF;
> +
> + sz = count*sizeof(*ureq);
Please check all the syscalls for multiplication overflow.
> +asmlinkage long sys_pfm_read_pmds(int fd, struct pfarg_pmd __user *ureq, int count)
> +{
> + struct pfm_context *ctx;
> + struct pfarg_pmd pmds[PFM_PMD_STK_ARG];
> + struct pfarg_pmd *req;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + size_t sz;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (count < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ctx = pfm_get_ctx(fd);
> + if (unlikely(ctx == NULL))
> + return -EBADF;
> +
> + sz = count*sizeof(*ureq);
> +
> + ret = pfm_get_args(ureq, sz, sizeof(pmds), pmds, (void **)&req);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, flags);
> +
> + ret = pfm_check_task_state(ctx, PFM_CMD_STOPPED, &flags);
> + if (!ret)
> + ret = __pfm_read_pmds(ctx, req, count);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
> +
> + if (copy_to_user(ureq, req, sz))
> + ret = -EFAULT;
There's a risk here that if pfm_check_task_state() returned false, we just
copied a hunk of uninitialised kernel memory out to userspace.
AFAICT that won't happen because the memory at *req was also copied _in_
from userspace. But this idiom is all over the place in this patch and I'd
like you to say that this is all expected, designed-for and will be forever
safe.
> + if (count > PFM_PMD_STK_ARG)
> + kfree(req);
> +error:
> + pfm_put_ctx(ctx);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
>
> ...
>
> +asmlinkage long sys_pfm_stop(int fd)
None of these syscalls are documented. Where does one go to find the API
description?
> +{
> + struct pfm_context *ctx;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ctx = pfm_get_ctx(fd);
> + if (unlikely(ctx == NULL))
> + return -EBADF;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, flags);
> +
> + ret = pfm_check_task_state(ctx, PFM_CMD_STOPPED, &flags);
> + if (!ret)
> + ret = __pfm_stop(ctx);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
> +
> + pfm_put_ctx(ctx);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
>
> ...
>
> +asmlinkage long sys_pfm_create_evtsets(int fd, struct pfarg_setdesc __user *ureq, int count)
> +{
> + struct pfm_context *ctx;
> + struct pfarg_setdesc *req;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + size_t sz;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (count < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ctx = pfm_get_ctx(fd);
> + if (ctx == NULL)
> + return -EBADF;
> +
> + sz = count*sizeof(*ureq);
> +
> + ret = pfm_get_args(ureq, sz, 0, NULL, (void **)&req);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, flags);
> +
> + ret = pfm_check_task_state(ctx, PFM_CMD_UNLOADED, &flags);
> + if (!ret)
> + ret = __pfm_create_evtsets(ctx, req, count);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
> +
> + if (copy_to_user(ureq, req, sz))
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> +
> + kfree(req);
> +
> +error:
> + pfm_put_ctx(ctx);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
When copying a struct from kernel to userspace we must beware of
compiler-inserted padding. Because that can cause the kernel to leak
a few bytes of uninitialised kernel memory.
Unless `struct pfarg_setdesc' is very carefully designed and very simply
laid out it might be best just to zero out the kernel memory in
pfm_get_args().
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists