[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060823083859.GA8936@2ka.mipt.ru>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:39:00 +0400
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
To: Jari Sundell <sundell.software@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
nmiell@...cast.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
drepper@...hat.com, akpm@...l.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
zach.brown@...cle.com, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [take12 0/3] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:22:06AM +0200, Jari Sundell (sundell.software@...il.com) wrote:
> On 8/23/06, Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru> wrote:
> >void * in structure exported to userspace is forbidden.
>
> Only void * I'm seeing belongs to the user, (udata) perhaps you are
> talking of something different?
Yes, exactly about it.
I put union {
u32 a[2];
void *b;
}
epcially to eliminate that problem.
And I'm not that sure aboit stuff like uptr_t or how they call pointers
in userspace and kernelspace.
> >long in syscall requires wrapper in per-arch code (although that
> >workaround _is_ there, it does not mean that broken interface should
> >be used).
> >poll uses millisecods - it is perfectly ok.
>
> The kernel is there to hide those ugly implementation details from the
> user, so I don't care that much about a workaround being required in
> some cases. More important, IMHO is consistency with the POSIX system
> calls.
>
> I guess as long as you use usec, at least it won't be a pain to use.
Andrew suggested to use nanoseconds there in u64 variable.
I think it is ok.
> Rakshasa
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists