[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200608231050.13272.ak@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:50:13 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] paravirt.h
> Yes, after discussion with Rusty, it appears that beefing up
> stop_machine_run is the right way to go. And it has benefits for
> non-paravirt code as well, such as allowing plug-in kprobes or oprofile
> extension modules to be loaded without having to deal with a debug
> exception or NMI during module load/unload.
I'm still unclear where you think those debug exceptions will come from?
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists