[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200608241333.35985.ak@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:33:35 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: mm fix x86 cpuid keys used in alternative_smp fix
On Thursday 24 August 2006 12:58, Paul Jackson wrote:
> From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
>
> The x86_64 crosstool build was failing due to:
>
> kernel/built-in.o(.smp_altinstructions+0x58): \
> include/asm/spinlock.h:54: undefined reference to `X86_FEATURE_UP'
>
> This reference to X86_FEATURE_UP was added to the definition of
> the alternative_smp() macro in alternative.h by the patch:
> x86_64-mm-fix-x86-cpuid-keys-used-in-alternative_smp
>
> The alternative_smp() macro is used in spinlock.h.
>
> The definition of X86_FEATURE_UP is in asm-x86_64/cpufeature.h.
> If this is included in alternative.h, then the build succeeds.
Ok it seems to depend on the .config, but nobody before submitted
the buggy .config
I folded the patch in
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists