[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060824093616.K30362@mail.kroptech.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:36:16 -0400
From: Adam Kropelin <akropel1@...hester.rr.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux RAID Mailing List <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
marc@...kel.com
Subject: Re: Linux: Why software RAID?
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 02:20:50PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Ar Iau, 2006-08-24 am 09:07 -0400, ysgrifennodd Adam Kropelin:
> > Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
> > with sw RAID of course if the builder is careful to use multiple PCI
> > cards, etc. Sw RAID over your motherboard's onboard controllers leaves
> > you vulnerable.
>
> Generally speaking the channels on onboard ATA are independant with any
> vaguely modern card.
Ahh, I did not know that. Does this apply to master/slave connections on
the same PATA cable as well? I know zero about PATA, but I assumed from
the terminology that master and slave needed to cooperate rather closely.
> And for newer systems well the motherboard tends to
> be festooned with random SATA controllers, all separate!
And how. You can't swing a dead cat without hitting a half-dozen ATA
ports these days. And most of them are those infuriatingly insecure SATA
connectors that pop off when you look at them cross-eyed...
--Adam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists