lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060824140043.GL28594@kvack.org>
Date:	Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:00:43 -0400
From:	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
To:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Cc:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <sergeh@...ibm.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, kjhall@...ibm.com,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LSM ML <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Safford <safford@...ibm.com>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] SLIM main patch

On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:58:03AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Still not certain this is needed.  If you were able to write data to a
> pipe, then even though data may be in the buffer, the other end
> shouldn't be able to read it if it's own level were changed.

Then what is the benefit of the supposed revoke if it can be trivially 
bypassed?  Security has not been improved.  It is better not to provide 
a supposed feature than to offer it up so riddled with holes as to make 
it pointless.

		-ben
-- 
"Time is of no importance, Mr. President, only life is important."
Don't Email: <dont@...ck.org>.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ