[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060824141657.GC32764@sergelap.austin.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:16:57 -0500
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <sergeh@...ibm.com>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Cc: serue@...ibm.com, Serge E Hallyn <sergeh@...ibm.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, kjhall@...ibm.com,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LSM ML <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
David Safford <safford@...ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] SLIM main patch
Quoting Benjamin LaHaise (bcrl@...ck.org):
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:58:03AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Still not certain this is needed. If you were able to write data to a
> > pipe, then even though data may be in the buffer, the other end
> > shouldn't be able to read it if it's own level were changed.
>
> Then what is the benefit of the supposed revoke if it can be trivially
> bypassed?
How is it being bypassed?
If it can be shown how what is there is insufficient, then it'll have to
be fixed. I'm just not seeing it yet.
> Security has not been improved. It is better not to provide
> a supposed feature than to offer it up so riddled with holes as to make
> it pointless.
Some would say it's better to show what you've got, let others point out
the faults, and fix them. How else will anything ever get done...
-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists