[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5878.1156868702@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:25:02 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Dong Feng <middle.fengdong@...il.com>, ak@...e.de,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org> wrote:
> > Which arches do not support cmpxchg?
>
> MIPS, Alpha - probably any pure RISC load/store architecture.
Some of these have LL/SC or equivalent instead, but ARM5 and before, FRV, M68K
before 68020 to name but a few.
And anything that implements CMPXCHG with spinlocks is a really bad candidate
for CMPXCHG-based rwsems.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists