[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060831102127.8fb9a24b.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:21:27 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: torvalds@...l.org, steved@...hat.com, trond.myklebust@....uio.no,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@...hat.com,
nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock
sharing [try #13]
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:58:30 +0100
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> wrote:
>
> > - Send fine-grained incremental patches. It's OK to do complete
> > replacement patchsets when the code is new, but this stuff is supposed to
> > be stabilised.
>
> I thought the code was still officially *new*.
It's been floating around for ages; we want it to become *old*, showing a
decreasing rate of change.
> As I understood things from what you said, you delegated responsibility for my
> patches on to Trond, who hasn't taken them yet.
Trond merged the large nfs-affecting ones; I don't know if he intends to
handle the non-nfs bulk of the work though.
I doesn't matter, really - I'll frequently carry features with a plan to
send them into a subsystem tree. Or Trond could duck it and I can send the
patches direct to Linus after git-nfs has merged.
Either way, the patches which are presently in -mm are "in the pipeline" -
they're the ones which people are testing (for compile, at least) and
reviewing (hah). If we decide to send them into Trond then I'll add them
to my things-to-spam-maintainers-with pile.
Your CONFIG_BLOCK patches did a decent job of trashing your
fs-cache-make-kafs-* patches, btw. What's up with that? OK, it's sensible
for people to work against mainline but the net effect of doing that is to
create a mess for other people to clean up.
> He has further delegated
> review responsibility on to Christoph, so I've been consolidating my patches
> to make it easier for Christoph (or whoever) to do so.
These patches are quite large and complex. Frankly, I doubt if Trond or
Christoph have the bandwidth to review them. It would be excellent if they
were able to, but...
We have a large coder-versus-reviewer imbalance, especially in the
filesystems area. cf reiser4.
> So, as I understand the situation, my patches won't go anywhere until
> Christoph ACKs them and Trond takes them into his tree. If this isn't so,
> please clarify the situation.
>
If Christoph acks them then I can send them to Trond or Linus, at Trond's
option.
Or I can butt out, drop the patches, wait for them to turn up in Trond's
tree, at your option.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists