| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <9849.1157018310@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:58:30 +0100 From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, torvalds@...l.org, steved@...hat.com, trond.myklebust@....uio.no, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@...hat.com, nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13] Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> wrote: > - Send fine-grained incremental patches. It's OK to do complete > replacement patchsets when the code is new, but this stuff is supposed to > be stabilised. I thought the code was still officially *new*. As I understood things from what you said, you delegated responsibility for my patches on to Trond, who hasn't taken them yet. He has further delegated review responsibility on to Christoph, so I've been consolidating my patches to make it easier for Christoph (or whoever) to do so. So, as I understand the situation, my patches won't go anywhere until Christoph ACKs them and Trond takes them into his tree. If this isn't so, please clarify the situation. David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists