linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:58:30 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, torvalds@...l.org,
	steved@...hat.com, trond.myklebust@....uio.no,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@...hat.com,
	nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13] 

Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> wrote:

> - Send fine-grained incremental patches.  It's OK to do complete
>   replacement patchsets when the code is new, but this stuff is supposed to
>   be stabilised.

I thought the code was still officially *new*.

As I understood things from what you said, you delegated responsibility for my
patches on to Trond, who hasn't taken them yet.  He has further delegated
review responsibility on to Christoph, so I've been consolidating my patches
to make it easier for Christoph (or whoever) to do so.

So, as I understand the situation, my patches won't go anywhere until
Christoph ACKs them and Trond takes them into his tree.  If this isn't so,
please clarify the situation.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/