[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1157123046.28577.75.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 08:04:06 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
akpm@...l.org, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, frankeh@...son.ibm.com,
rhim@...gateh.edu
Subject: Re: [patch 4/9] Guest page hinting: volatile swap cache.
On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 13:10 +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PAGE_STATES)
> +
> +struct page * find_get_page_nodiscard(struct address_space *mapping,
> + unsigned long offset)
> +{
> + struct page *page;
> +
> + read_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
> + page = radix_tree_lookup(&mapping->page_tree, offset);
> + if (page)
> + page_cache_get(page);
> + read_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
> + return page;
> +}
> +
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(find_get_page_nodiscard);
> +
> +#endif
Is it worth having another full copy of find_get_page()? What about a
"nodiscard" argument?
-- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists