[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060902094818.49e5e1b1.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 09:48:18 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>
Cc: Alex Dubov <oakad@...oo.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: Support for TI FlashMedia (pci id 104c:8033, 104c:803b) flash
card readers
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 13:15:52 +0200
Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx> wrote:
> Andrew, the stuff meant for you is at the bottom.
<panics>
> Alex Dubov wrote:
> > Hi there.
> > I've made a couple of fixes to my flashmedia driver
> > (http://developer.berlios.de/projects/tifmxx/) to the
> > effect of much improved R/W speed in PIO mode and
> > writing speed in DMA mode.
> >
>
> The users will be pleased :)
>
> > I also tried to clean-up reverse engineering mess out
> > of the code - it should be more readable now.
> >
>
> Wonderful. Things are looking a lot better. I have a few questions though.
>
> The constants you've borrowed from OMAP, have you confirmed all of them?
> If not, you should add a comment to those that are pure speculation so far.
>
> tifm_sd_op_flags() still use literals. Could you fix up some defines
> there as well?
>
> tifm_sd_fetch_resp() could be redone as a for loop to make it more
> obvious what's going on. Also, please don't put several statements on
> one line.
>
> You should probably rename tifm_sd_set_data_to(). It isn't obvious that
> 'to' stands for 'timeout'. Same thing with other instances of 'to'.
>
> We're also in the process of fixing this dreadfully slow write mess.
> What I'd like to see from you is to double check that bytes_xfered is
> set to the number of bytes successfully sent to the _card_, not the
> controller. This is critical for correct handling of bus errors.
>
> > Next on my list is MemoryStick functionality.
> >
> >
>
> I would suggest finishing this and getting it merged to be your top
> priority. There are quite a few people who would like to have this
> hardware supported. Which brings me to...
>
> Andrew, we could use some help with how this driver should fit into the
> kernel tree. The hardware is multi-function, so there will be a couple
> of drivers, one for every function, and a common part. How has this been
> organised in the past?
>
Greg would be a far better person that I for this. Is it a PCI device?
--
VGER BF report: H 0
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists